|
Action Plan
Study:
If 2nd and 3rd grade teachers are
provided with a writing mentor program and participate in ongoing book
studies, will their students’ sentence length, syntax grade level, use of
transitions and ability to write in paragraphs increase by a measurable
amount?
|
||||
|
Goals:
·
To improve 2nd and 3rd grade students’ ability
to: write in paragraph form using effective transitions, increase sentence
length, and syntax grade level.
·
To further develop teachers’ confidence and knowledge in writing instruction.
|
||||
|
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
Collect
student journal and writing samples to find strengths and weaknesses before
and after study for the purpose of comparison.
|
Four classroom
teachers in grades 2-3.
Mrs.
Meneses
|
May 2012
|
Student
journals and writing samples
|
Flesch-Kincaid
Readability Score on MS Word
|
|
Conduct writing curriculum based assessments every six
weeks
|
Four
classroom teachers in grades 2-3.
Mrs.
Meneses
|
Throughout
the 2012-2013 school year
|
Curriculum
based assessments for grades 2-5
|
Writing
committee will record and analyze data by charting progress on given TEKS
across grade levels. Teachers will use this data to guide instruction.
|
|
Coordinating book-studies that focus on writing
instruction. An effective author is Ralph Fletcher, who has several wonderful
books on the topic.
|
Four
classroom teachers in grades 2-3.
Mrs.
Meneses
|
9/2012-12/2013
|
Ralph
Fletcher literature (quantity to be determined at a later date)
|
Teacher
and student questionnaires will be used to determine effectiveness of book
study. Lesson plans and classroom observations will be used to evaluate
progress.
|
|
Using effective teachers to share
knowledge through co-teaching, modeling instruction, and mentoring.
|
Four
classroom teachers in grades 2-3.
Mrs.
Meneses
|
Throughout
the 2012-2013 school year
|
Lesson
plans, anchor charts, etc. created by
mentor teacher
|
Questionnaires
will be used to determine effectiveness of book study. Lesson plans and
classroom observations will be used to evaluate progress in both teachers and
students.
|
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Revised Action Plan
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Revising My Action Research Plan
The conference with my site supervisor was extremely
insightful and interesting. Mr. Silverman and I sat down for about 45 minutes
to discuss my action research plan, therefore I had the opportunity to share my
ideas and get some great feedback.
After discussing the questions and the activities on
my action research plan, we came to the conclusion that it would be best to
eliminate student motivation and focus on teacher development. This was due to
the fact that whatever data being collected must be measurable. Mr. Silverman
and I agreed that it would be far too challenging at this point to measure
student motivation. Never the less, we concluded that focusing on specific
writing goals would be measurable. Another
revision made was to minimize the grade levels participating in the action
research. We agreed that the grade levels with the greatest weakness are 2nd
and 3rd grade. So we determined that I would collect writing samples
at the end of this school year from those grades only. These writing samples
will be analyzed for syntax grade level, sentence length, average of
transitions per sentence, and students’ capability to write using paragraphs. I
will be entering these writing samples into the Flesch-Kincaid Readability
Score on MS Word. By doing so, I will I will find the level of readability of
each writing sample. Readability statistics are good predictors of the level of
difficulty of documents, especially technical ones.
Mr. Silverman and I feel that these skills are the
most challenging for teachers and students. If students are able to improve in
these areas, they are most likely using stronger conventions and applying
literacy skills to their writing. What we have planned is that I will collect
these samples from 4 particular teachers in May of this school year. The
following school year, the same teachers will provide writing samples in May
again, but from their current students. This allows the teacher to apply
knowledge acquired through the mentor program and book studies. If the teacher
has grown professionally, it should be evident when data is collected and
compared to the previous year. The groups of students must meet similar
criteria though. We concluded that the activities that would be most
appropriate for this study are the following: Implementing a mentor program among
2 bilingual teachers and 2 monolingual teachers, and organizing on going book
studies that provide teachers with opportunities to develop professional
competence. Both the mentor program and book studies will show teachers how to
use mentor texts to teach writing. That
being said, I have revised my action plan question.
My new research question is:
If 2nd and 3rd grade teachers are
provided with a writing mentor program and participate in ongoing book studies,
will their students’ sentence length, syntax grade level, use of transitions
and ability to write in paragraphs increase by a measurable amount?
Assessments and accountability was another topic
discussed during our meeting. Mr. Silverman is allowing me to create six-week
assessments for teachers who are participating in the mentor program to use
during the upcoming school year. The purpose of these assessments is to monitor
both teacher and student progress and to keep teachers accountable throughout
the year. Too often, we hear that teachers “don’t have time” for writing
because they are busy preparing kid for state exams. Other times, teachers say
they integrate writing throughout content areas, yet they don’t do it
effectively.
In addition, my principal and I talked about how we
will select teachers being asked to participate. We want to make sure that
teachers asked to participate are not only in agreement, but feel the necessity
for the mentorship program. It is also imperative that these teachers are not
currently using teaching strategies such as the ones discussed by the author,
Ralph Fletcher. We feel that the study would be most effective if participating
teachers were enthusiastic and eager to grow professionally. One of my fears in conducting this research
study was that my principal would not allow me to monitor other teachers, but he
permitted me to observe teachers by conducting walkthroughs before and after
the mentoring program is initiated.
After having this conference with my supervisor, I
feel much more confident and ready to begin my action research. The meeting not
only provided me with guidance, but also made me foresee this action research
study much more clearly.
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Action Research Plan
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Brainstorming Ideas for Action Research
My conference with Mr. Silverman, my principal, was quite
interesting and very successful. We discussed a problem that we have noticed
more prevalent as time has passed. Our bilingual program does not have a clear
definition in terms of goals and objectives per grade level. What I mean is
that the percentage of English and Spanish taught throughout content areas are
not cohesive from grade level to grade level. I mentioned to him that students
are coming into 3rd and 4th grade without the ability to
transfer knowledge, which is expected by this time. We discussed the lack of
teacher proficiency in either English or Spanish as well. In addition, we
talked about the type of professional development that might benefit some of
the bilingual teachers on campus. His opinion about this topic was that it was
a good, but not a great topic for me to begin an action research study on,
because he feels that I’m already very knowledgeable on the matter.
We also conversed
about the low Science scores on Curriculum based assessments and state
assessments. We specifically talked about our Hispanic students scoring lower
than the White and African-American populations. I mentioned about some ideas
for possible solutions that I have been brainstorming. I asked him what his
opinion was about choosing our strongest Science teacher and having him
co-teach alongside other teachers in order to provide modeling for teachers who
could benefit. I also mentioned that this teacher could be in charge of
observing other teachers while they teach, not with the intention of
criticizing, but with the purpose of providing feedback. Since this might be
intimidating for some teachers, it could first be provided to teachers who
actually yearn for guidance. I explained to him that I have had a teachers sent
to my classroom; one by our Bilingual Coordinator and another by the Reading
Specialist. For them it was a positive experience because I shared my ideas, my
resources or materials, and I modeled my style of teaching. Both of these teachers
were very pleased and unthreatened by the experience. One of the teachers was
from another school in our district, and to this day we share ideas and
resources. When I reminded my principal of this, he seemed to be more open to
the idea of selecting an effective Science teacher to share the knowledge with
others. Mr. Silverman shared with me how difficult it can be to wear so many
hats as a principal. He said this might be a good opportunity to select someone
else to do what might be an overwhelming for him. We talked about the duties
that make-up most of his day. Handling discipline issues, answering phone
calls, talking to concerned parents, and lunch duty. All of these things take
away time that he could dedicate to modeling effective instruction and conducting
longer walk-throughs. He thought it would be a good idea to have Mr. Hanberick,
our most knowledgeable Science teacher take the lead in raising our scores,
although he understood it might be somewhat uncomfortable to some individuals
on campus.
The last thing we
discussed was a problem that he and I have discussed before. Our students tend
to have difficulty producing a cohesive piece of writing. This is a weakness we
are seeing in all grade levels. I believe that Mr. Silverman mentioned this
topic of study because he knows how much I enjoy teaching Language Arts. He
wanted me to know that he is not only concerned about the 4th grade
STAAR assessment, but more than anything, concerned about the quality of
writers we are eventually sending to middle school and so on. We spoke about
ideas fro professional development, the deep connection between reading and
writing, and finally about how teaching with a passion can have a great effect
on our students. Although I have not yet researched this deeper, and I have not
conducted any data analysis, I have an idea on motivating both teachers and
students. I shared some of these ideas with my supervisor and he was very
interested. Because my supervisor demonstrated deep concern for this issue, I
decided that this will be the topic for my action research project. I look
forward to learning through my inquiry and making a difference on my campus. I
plan to use my findings to benefit whatever setting I may lead in the future.
Sunday, March 4, 2012
What Every Leader in Education Should Be Doing
What is Action/Inquiry Research?
Inquiry research is the process in which a principal engages in systematic and intentional study of a topic involving administrative practice. The practitioner poses a question and devotes the time and energy in order to find new understandings. This process not only involves research such as reading relevant literature, but also a plan of action in which data is collected and analyzed. In addition, the process involves reflection, and the ultimate goal is to seek out change. Ultimately, an administrative inquiry is the vehicle for school improvement and success. The principal is able to feel ownership for his/her own development. This in turn, provides a great example for the teachers to do the same.
Advantages of Conducting Action Research
There are many benefits in conducting administrative inquiry. A powerful advantage in implementing action research is that the principal is able to control his or her own professional development because he/she becomes the head learner. Administrative inquiry is interactive, practical and designed around the needs of teachers and students. Without action research it is less likely that the principal will find the time to identify future problems or look for solutions to existing problems in the school. Also, because the principal is the only individual on campus with that position, this type of inquiry gives him/her the opportunity to venture out and have quality interaction with others in the school as well as other principals. When conducting action research, the principal focuses on a problem, plan of action, and solution; instead of pondering on several tasks and never fully completing them. Because the principal has a plan of action and is continuously reflecting, he/she is able to be proactive instead of simply reacting to existing problems. Consistent action inquiry provides the leader with the opportunity to model for his/her teachers and students, which benefits the school climate and organization. In conclusion, when administrators begin to practice action inquiry, best practices begin to flourish due to new findings in data.
How Educational Leaders Can Use Blogs
Blogging is the journal of the 21st Century. It is a powerful way for leaders in education to capture their own thinking and organize their research. Not only is it a great way to collect data, it is also a wonderful way to share it with others in the field. Principals are able to share their inquiry research with principals and educators who work all over the country. They are also able to learn from other principal’s research or reflections. Since bloggs are cumulative, one is able to go back and read in order to reflect on the past and any pondering questions one might have had. This means that learning is constant as well as the process of reflection. This turns into thinking with a motive and reason. The act of reflection is beneficial in four distinct ways. It provides the educational leader with clarification because it encourages one to think deep and big by creating questions that help mold our research. It provides us with empowerment due to the fact that we become advocates for our schools, hence challenging others. It is generative because blogging is tangible, and it’s a way to communicate with parents and coworkers. And finally, it provides the leader with a sense of accomplishment.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)